Jump To

PRADAXA SIDE EFFECTS

  • Generic Name: dabigatran etexilate mesylate
  • Brand Name: Pradaxa
  • Drug Class: Anticoagulants, Cardiovascular, Thrombin Inhibitors
Last updated on MDtodate: 10/10/2022

SIDE EFFECTS

The following clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labeling:

  • Increased Risk of Thrombotic Events after Premature Discontinuation
  • Risk of Bleeding.
  • Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia or Puncture .
  • Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events in Patients with Prosthetic Heart Valves .
  • Increased Risk of Thrombosis in Patients with Triple-Positive Antiphospholipid Syndrome .
  • The most serious adverse reactions reported with PRADAXA were related to bleeding.

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reactions rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Reduction Of Risk Of Stroke And Systemic Embolism In Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

The RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant Therapy) study provided safety information on the use of two doses of PRADAXA and warfarin.The numbers of patients and their exposures are described in Table 1. Limited information is presented on the 110 mg dosing arm because this dose is not approved.

Table 1 : Summary of Treatment Exposure in RE-LY

PRADAXA 110 mg twice daily PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily Warfarin
Total number treated 5983 6059 5998
Exposure
> 12 months 4936 4939 5193
> 24 months 2387 2405 2470
Mean exposure (months) 20.5 20.3 21.3
Total patient-years 10,242 10,261 10,659

 

Drug Discontinuation In RE-LY

The rates of adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation were 21% for PRADAXA 150 mg and 16% for warfarin. The most frequent adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of PRADAXA were bleeding and gastrointestinal events (i.e., dyspepsia, nausea, upper abdominal pain, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and diarrhea).

Bleeding [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]

Table 2 shows the number of adjudicated major bleeding events during the treatment period in the RE-LY study, with the bleeding rate per 100 subject-years (%). Major bleeding is defined as bleeding accompanied by one or more of the following: a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥2 g/dL, a transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells, bleeding at a critical site or with a fatal outcome. Intracranial hemorrhage included intracerebral (hemorrhagic stroke), subarachnoid, and subdural bleeds.

Table 2 : Adjudicated Major Bleeding Events in Treated Patientsa

Event PRADAXA 150 mg
N = 6059 n (%/yearb)
Warfarin
N = 5998 n (%/yearb)
PRADAXA 150 mg vs. Warfarin HR (95% CI)
Major Bleedingc 350 (3.47) 374 (3.58) 0.97 (0.84, 1.12)
Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH)d 23 (0.22) 82 (0.77) 0.29 (0.18, 0.46)
Hemorrhagic Strokee 6 (0.06) 40 (0.37) 0.16 (0.07, 0.37)
Other ICH 17 (0.17) 46 (0.43) 0.38 (0.22, 0.67)
Gastrointestinal 162 (1.59) 111 (1.05) 1.51 (1.19, 1.92)
Fatal Bleedingf 7 (0.07) 16 (0.15) 0.45 (0.19, 1.10)
ICH 3 (0.03) 9 (0.08) 0.35 (0.09, 1.28)
Non-intracranialg 4 (0.04) 7 (0.07) 0.59 (0.17, 2.02)
aPatients during treatment or within 2 days of stopping study treatment. Major bleeding events within each subcategory were counted once per patient, but patients may have contributed events to multiple subcategories.
bAnnual event rate per 100 pt-years = 100 * number of subjects with event/subject-years. Subject-years is defined as cumulative number of days from first drug intake to event date, date of last drug intake + 2, death date (whatever occurred first) across all treated subjects divided by 365.25. In case of recurrent events of the same category, the first event was considered.
cDefined as bleeding accompanied by one or more of the following: a decrease in hemoglobin of ≥2 g/dL, a transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells, bleeding at a critical site or with fatal outcome.
dIntracranial bleed included intracerebral (hemorrhagic stroke), subarachnoid, and subdural bleeds.
eOn-treatment analysis based on the safety population, compared to ITT analysis presented in Section 14 Clinical Studies.
fFatal bleed: Adjudicated major bleed as defined above with investigator reported fatal outcome and adjudicated death with primary cause from bleeding.
gNon-intracranial fatal bleed: Adjudicated major bleed as defined above and adjudicated death with primary cause from bleeding but without symptomatic intracranial bleed based on investigator’s clinical assessment.

 

There was a higher rate of any gastrointestinal bleeds in patients receiving PRADAXA 150 mg than in patients receiving warfarin (6.6% vs. 4.2%, respectively).

The risk of major bleeds was similar with PRADAXA 150 mg and warfarin across major subgroups defined by baseline characteristics (see Figure 1), with the exception of age, where there was a trend towards a higher incidence of major bleeding on PRADAXA (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.5) for patients ≥75 years of age.

Figure 1 : Adjudicated Major Bleeding by Baseline Characteristics Including Hemorrhagic Stroke Treated Patients

Adjudicated Major Bleeding by Baseline
Characteristics Including Hemorrhagic Stroke Treated Patients - Illustration

 

Note: The figure above presents effects in various subgroups all of which are baseline characteristics and all of which were pre-specified. The 95% confidence limits that are shown do not take into account how many comparisons were made, nor do they reflect the effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other factors. Apparent homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be over-interpreted.

Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions

Patients on PRADAXA 150 mg had an increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions (35% vs. 24% on warfarin). These were commonly dyspepsia (including abdominal pain upper, abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, and epigastric discomfort) and gastritis-like symptoms (including GERD, esophagitis, erosive gastritis, gastric hemorrhage, hemorrhagic gastritis, hemorrhagic erosive gastritis, and gastrointestinal ulcer).

Hypersensitivity Reactions

In the RE-LY study, drug hypersensitivity (including urticaria, rash, and pruritus), allergic edema, anaphylactic reaction, and anaphylactic shock were reported in <0.1% of patients receiving PRADAXA.

Treatment And Reduction In The Risk Of Recurrence Of Deep Venous Thrombosis And Pulmonary Embolism

PRADAXA was studied in 4387 patients in 4 pivotal, parallel, randomized, double-blind trials. Three of these trials were active-controlled (warfarin) (RE-COVER, RE-COVER II, and RE-MEDY), and one study (RE-SONATE) was placebo-controlled. The demographic characteristics were similar among the 4 pivotal studies and between the treatment groups within these studies. Approximately 60% of the treated patients were male, with a mean age of 55.1 years. The majority of the patients were white (87.7%), 10.3% were Asian, and 1.9% were black with a mean CrCl of 105.6 mL/min.

Bleeding events for the 4 pivotal studies were classified as major bleeding events if at least one of the following criteria applied: fatal bleeding, symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ (intraocular, intracranial, intraspinal or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, retroperitoneal bleeding, intra-articular bleeding, or pericardial bleeding), bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 2.0 g/dL (1.24 mmol/L or more, or leading to transfusion of 2 or more units of whole blood or red cells).

RE-COVER and RE-COVER II studies compared PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily and warfarin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Patients received 5-10 days of an approved parenteral anticoagulant therapy followed by 6 months, with mean exposure of 164 days, of oral only treatment; warfarin was overlapped with parenteral therapy. Table 3 shows the number of patients experiencing bleeding events in the pooled analysis of RE-COVER and RE-COVER II studies during the full treatment including parenteral and oral only treatment periods after randomization.

Table 3 : Bleeding Events in RE-COVER and RE-COVER II Treated Patients

Patients Bleeding Events-Full Treatment Period Including Parenteral Treatment
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily
N (%) N=2553
Warfarin
N (%) N=2554
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)c
Major bleeding eventa 37 (1.4) 51 (2.0) 0.73 (0.48, 1.11)
Fatal bleeding 1 (0.04) 2 (0.1)
Bleeding in a critical area or organ 7 (0.3) 15 (0.6)
Fall in hemoglobin ≥2 g/dL or transfusion ≥2 units of whole blood or packed red blood cells 32 (1.3) 38 (1.5)
Bleeding sites for MBEb
Intracranial 2 (0.1) 5 (0.2)
Retroperitoneal 2 (0.1) 1 (0.04)
Intraarticular 2 (0.1) 4 (0.2)
Intramuscular 2 (0.1) 6 (0.2)
Gastrointestinal 15 (0.6) 14 (0.5)
Urogenital 7 (0.3) 14 (0.5)
Other 8 (0.3) 8 (0.3)
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding 101 (4.0) 170 (6.7) 0.58 (0.46, 0.75)
Any bleeding 411 (16.1) 567 (22.7) 0.70 (0.61, 0.79)
Note: MBE can belong to more than one criterion.
aPatients with at least one MBE.
bBleeding site based on investigator assessment. Patients can have more than one site of bleeding.
cConfidence interval

 

The rate of any gastrointestinal bleeds in patients receiving PRADAXA 150 mg in the full treatment period was 3.1% (2.4% on warfarin).

The RE-MEDY and RE-SONATE studies provided safety information on the use of PRADAXA for the reduction in the risk of recurrence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

RE-MEDY was an active-controlled study (warfarin) in which 1430 patients received PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily following 3 to 12 months of oral anticoagulant regimen. Patients in the treatment studies who rolled over into the RE-MEDY study had a combined treatment duration of up to more than 3 years, with mean exposure of 473 days. Table 4 shows the number of patients experiencing bleeding events in the study.

Table 4 : Bleeding Events in RE-MEDY Treated Patients

Patients PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily
N (%) N=1430
Warfarin
N (%) N=1426
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)c
Major bleeding eventa 13 (0.9) 25 (1.8) 0.54 (0.25, 1.16)
Fatal bleeding 0 1 (0.1)
Bleeding in a critical area or organ 7 (0.5) 11 (0.8)
Fall in hemoglobin ≥2 g/dL or transfusion ≥2 units of whole blood or packed red blood cells 7 (0.5) 16 (1.1)
Bleeding sites for MBEb
Intracranial 2 (0.1) 4 (0.3)
Intraocular 4 (0.3) 2 (0.1)
Retroperitoneal 0 1 (0.1)
Intraarticular 0 2 (0.1)
Intramuscular 0 4 (0.3)
Gastrointestinal 4 (0.3) 8 (0.6)
Urogenital 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
Other 2 (0.1) 4 (0.3)
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding 71 (5.0) 125 (8.8) 0.56 (0.42, 0.75)
Any bleeding 278 (19.4) 373 (26.2) 0.71 (0.61, 0.83)
Note: MBE can belong to more than one criterion.
aPatients with at least one MBE.
bBleeding site based on investigator assessment. Patients can have more than one site of bleeding.
cConfidence interval

 

In the RE-MEDY study, the rate of any gastrointestinal bleeds in patients receiving PRADAXA 150 mg was 3.1% (2.2% on warfarin).

RE-SONATE was a placebo-controlled study in which 684 patients received PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily following 6 to 18 months of oral anticoagulant regimen. Patients in the treatment studies who rolled over into the RE-SONATE study had combined treatment duration up to 9 months, with mean exposure of 165 days. Table 5 shows the number of patients experiencing bleeding events in the study.

Table 5 : Bleeding Events in RE-SONATE Treated Patients

Patients PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily
N (%) N=684
Placebo
N (%) N=659
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)c
Major bleeding eventa 2 (0.3) 0
Bleeding in a critical area or organ 0 0
Gastrointestinalb 2 (0.3) 0
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding 34 (5.0) 13 (2.0) 2.54 (1.34, 4.82)
Any bleeding 72 (10.5) 40 (6.1) 1.77 (1.20, 2.61)
Note: MBE can belong to more than one criterion.
aPatients with at least one MBE.
bBleeding site based on investigator assessment. Patients can have more than one site of bleeding.
cConfidence interval

 

In the RE-SONATE study, the rate of any gastrointestinal bleeds in patients receiving PRADAXA 150 mg was 0.7% (0.3% on placebo).

Clinical Myocardial Infarction Events

In the active-controlled VTE studies, a higher rate of clinical myocardial infarction was reported in patients who received PRADAXA [20 (0.66 per 100 patient-years)] than in those who received warfarin [5 (0.17 per 100 patient-years)]. In the placebo-controlled study, a similar rate of non-fatal and fatal clinical myocardial infarction was reported in patients who received PRADAXA [1 (0.32 per 100 patient-years)] and in those who received placebo [1 (0.34 per 100 patient-years)].

Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions

In the four pivotal studies, patients on PRADAXA 150 mg had a similar incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions (24.7% vs. 22.7% on warfarin). Dyspepsia (including abdominal pain upper, abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, and epigastric discomfort) occurred in patients on PRADAXA in 7.5% vs. 5.5% on warfarin, and gastritis-like symptoms (including gastritis, GERD, esophagitis, erosive gastritis and gastric hemorrhage) occurred at 3.0% vs. 1.7%, respectively.

Hypersensitivity Reactions

In the 4 pivotal studies, drug hypersensitivity (including urticaria, rash, and pruritus), allergic edema, anaphylactic reaction, and anaphylactic shock were reported in 0.1% of patients receiving PRADAXA.

Prophylaxis Of Deep Vein Thrombosis And Pulmonary Embolism Following Hip Replacement Surgery

PRADAXA was studied in 5476 patients, randomized and treated in two double-blind, active-controlled non-inferiority trials (RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II). The demographic characteristics were similar across the two studies and between the treatment groups within these studies. Approximately 45.3% of the treated patients were male, with a mean age of 63.2 years. The majority of the patients were white (96.1%), 3.6% were Asian, and 0.3% were black with a mean CrCl of 92 mL/min.

Bleeding events for the RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II studies were classified as major bleeding events if at least one of the following criteria applied: fatal bleeding, symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ (intraocular, intracranial, intraspinal or retroperitoneal bleeding), bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 2.0 g/dL (1.24 mmol/L) or more, or leading to transfusion of 2 or more units of whole blood or red cells, requiring treatment cessation or leading to re-operation.

The RE-NOVATE study compared PRADAXA 75 mg taken orally 1-4 hours after surgery followed by 150 mg once daily, PRADAXA 110 mg taken orally 1-4 hours after surgery followed by 220 mg once daily and subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily initiated the evening before surgery for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients who had undergone hip replacement surgery. The RE-NOVATE II study compared PRADAXA 110 mg taken orally 1-4 hours after surgery followed by 220 mg once daily and subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily initiated the evening before surgery for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients who had undergone hip replacement surgery. In the RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II studies, patients received 28-35 days of PRADAXA or enoxaparin with median exposure of 33 days. Tables 6 and 7 show the number of patients experiencing bleeding events in the analysis of RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II.

Table 6 : Bleeding Events in RE-NOVATE Treated Patients

Patients PRADAXA 220 mg
N (%) N=1146
Enoxaparin
N (%) N=1154
Major bleeding event 23 (2.0) 18 (1.6)
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding 48 (4.2) 40 (3.5)
Any bleeding 141 (12.3) 132 (11.4)

 

Table 7 : Bleeding Events in RE-NOVATE II Treated Patients

Patients PRADAXA 220 mg
N (%)N=1010
Enoxaparin
N (%)N=1003
Major bleeding event 14 (1.4) 9 (0.9)
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding 26 (2.6) 20 (2.0)
Any bleeding 98 (9.7) 83 (8.3)

 

In the two studies, the rate of major gastrointestinal bleeds in patients receiving PRADAXA and enoxaparin was the same (0.1%) and for any gastrointestinal bleeds was 1.4% for PRADAXA 220 mg and 0.9% for enoxaparin.

Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions

In the two studies, the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions for patients on PRADAXA 220 mg and enoxaparin was 39.5% and 39.5%, respectively. Dyspepsia (including abdominal pain upper, abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, and epigastric discomfort) occurred in patients on PRADAXA 220 mg in 4.1% vs. 3.8% on enoxaparin, and gastritis-like symptoms (including gastritis, GERD, esophagitis, erosive gastritis and gastric hemorrhage) occurred at 0.6% vs. 1.0%, respectively.

Hypersensitivity Reactions

In the two studies, drug hypersensitivity (such as urticaria, rash, and pruritus) was reported in 0.3% of patients receiving PRADAXA 220 mg.

Clinical Myocardial Infarction Events

In the two studies, clinical myocardial infarction was reported in 2 (0.1%) of patients who received PRADAXA 220 mg and 6 (0.3%) of patients who received enoxaparin.

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post approval use of PRADAXA. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. The following adverse reactions have been identified during post approval use of PRADAXA: angioedema, thrombocytopenia, esophageal ulcer, alopecia, neutropenia, agranulocytosis.

 

SRC: NLM .

Read Next Article

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com